Introduction:
The internet
fosters a virtual world which is evolving with an awakening social
consciousness. It is fueled by images,
videos, sound clips, music, and tweets.
This virtual world allows people to share ideas, thoughts, and feelings around
the world instantly. This shift in
consciousness requires a new type of monument that can provide a meaningful and
relevant experience.
¿ How do you create a meaningful monument and experience for a global
society that values change over permanence, and no longer requires locale place
to give meaning?
Outline:
I will
discuss the changing reality of a globalizing world and the impact that has on
locale identity and understanding. Then,
I will explain the impact the changing construct of reality has on the
relevance and meaning of monuments.
Next, I will discuss the new role of monuments in a global society.
Thought:
Through the
virtual world of the internet, we associate ourselves with larger global
networks and groups. These global
groups are in constant motion, shifting, expanding, and contracting in response
to changing associations between internet users, (see Diagram 1).
We are increasingly
living our lives through our computer screen (Colbert, 2012).
Larger portions of our life are conducted in virtual space where speed
and access are more important than physical location. Physical environment and their locale
meanings are lost in this global environment.
Reality is perceived through a continuously changing flow of images (Virilio, 1998). This shift disconnects society from a stable
locale environment and reconnects it to a constantly changing global
experience.
This
shifting reality has ramifications to concepts of remembrance and cultural
heritage. This is manifest in society’s
monuments. Traditionally, monuments are created
to remember events tied to place and time.
They are created for a social group that has a relationship to an
event. As time passes, a disconnect
forms between the people of a place and the monument. When this happens, remembrance is neutralized. The monument becomes an artifact and its meaning
changes, (see Diagram 2).
As society
becomes less connected to place, static monuments will continue to lose their
relevance. Global society values change
over permanence and no longer requires locale place to give meaning. Maya Lin begins to address these ideas in her
last monument: What is Missing? Maya Lin describes the monument as existing in
many places at once, connected together by the internet allowing information
from the various sites to be monitored and shared (Lin, 2000). This creates a global understanding of the world
by showing the impact man has on the environment through access to virtual
memories in the form of image clips and stories of extinct and threatened
species and environments.
The virtual
monument created is in constant change. It
is not static; the work “exists in multiple forms and in multiple sites
simultaneously” (Project Info, 2012). The virtual monument connects a globally
accessible event to the spectator through social media and the internet. The virtual monument allows for members of
society to experience the event as a global group and actively participate in
the communal act of remembering what is lost and what we stand to lose, (see
Diagram 3).
Conclusion:
Society is becoming
more accustomed to the expanding access to information, places, and people. As a result, society is becoming less
dependent on locale place and identity; cultural boundaries are dematerializing. Virtual monuments are a way to connect global
society to meaningful and relevant experiences in the form of collective
memories.
References:
Bibliography
Project Info. (2012). Retrieved November 20, 2012, from What Is Missing?:
www.whatismissing.net
Colbert, Z. (2012, November). Digital Good Time -
Real Vs. Virtual and the Mitosis of Existence. Matter, Autumn Winter,
pp. 54-59.
Lin, M. (2000). Boundaries. New York: Simon
& Schster.
Virilio, P. (1998). Architecture in the Age of
its Virtual Disappearance. (J. Beckmann, Ed.) NY: Princeton Architecture
Press.

What is the fate of the icon in the age of virtual space? Does icon become more associated with time than with form as a result of our shift to the "constantly changing global experience"?
ReplyDeleteThe notion of 'collective memory' is fascinating - how do we choose events that are so totally encompassing as to warrant a monument that will be relevant to all? Or, is the idea more about creating a virtual monument that is only directly connected to a single group but spreads the message to all interested parties via communication networks?
ReplyDeleteEither way a connection is established, but one is more directly related to memory while the other is more about generating information.